We Asked AI to Define Masculinity. The Results Reveal Something Disturbing About the Future.

What happens when Trump, Obama, Rogan, and Scooby-Doo all agree? And why that should terrify you about deepfakes.

This week, we decided to do something ridiculous: We asked ChatGPT what it means to be a "real man." Then we asked it to answer as Donald Trump. Then Barack Obama. Then Joe Rogan. Then Rick Sanchez from Rick and Morty. Then, because why not, Scooby-Doo.

The results were fascinating, disturbing, and kind of hilarious.

Here's what we learned.

They All Said the Same Thing (Just in Different Words)

ChatGPT's base answer gave us 10 characteristics: emotional regulation, keeping your word, protecting without controlling, taking responsibility, leading with compassion, continuous self-improvement, knowing when to ask for help, creating more than you destroy, and choosing love over ego.

When we ran it through different personas, the core message barely changed. Obama emphasized character and unity. Rogan emphasized discipline and pushing limits. Trump's version (which he'd never actually say in real life) focused on strength and winning. Rick Sanchez acknowledged cosmic meaninglessness but still showed up.

Even Scooby-Doo got it right: "A real man is brave even when he's scared. A real man doesn't run from responsibility, only from ghosts."

Honestly? Scooby might've nailed it better than everyone else.

The Implications Are Terrifying

Here's where it gets dark: If an AI can simulate six completely different voices saying essentially the same thing with only minor tonal shifts, we're looking at the blueprint for weaponized deepfakes.

Imagine this same methodology applied to political messaging. Imagine a deepfake of your preferred candidate saying exactly what you want to hear - in their voice, with their cadence, perfectly tailored to confirm your existing beliefs. Now imagine you never question whether it's real.

That's not science fiction. That's next year.

ChatGPT is compressing human belief into ranked categories based on internet consensus, then wrapping it in whatever packaging you request. And right now, it's filtering out extremes like Andrew Tate (yes, it literally refused to simulate his toxic takes without a disclaimer). But those guardrails won't last forever.

We're All More Programmed Than We Think

The most uncomfortable realization from this experiment? We're not that different from the AI.

We're taught from birth to categorize everything: favorite color, favorite movie, political team, gender role. It's how we build a cognitive map of reality. But once those categories become weaponized - once "real man" becomes a political litmus test, we lose our ability to see common ground.

And that division is profitable. For cable news. For social media algorithms. For grifters selling testosterone pills and manosphere courses.

But here's the thing: When you strip away the performance and politics, most people actually agree on core values. Responsibility. Honesty. Compassion. Courage. The ability to be vulnerable without being weak.

The problem isn't a lack of consensus. The problem is we're addicted to the argument.

Masculinity isn't a zero-sum game. You don't have to choose between strength and empathy, between toughness and vulnerability, between being a protector and asking for support when you need it.

You just have to be honest. With yourself. With others. About what you know, what you don't, and what you're willing to figure out.

Scooby-Doo understood that. Maybe we should, too.

Listen to the full episode: brobots.me