Tech analysts project that AI twins — autonomous digital proxies built to mimic your voice, writing style, and decision-making — will manage up to 90% of our digital interactions within a few years. When that AI twin signs a contract, authorizes a transaction, or makes a financial commitment in your name: who is legally responsible? Jason's answer is direct: you are. Every AI twin company will have indemnification language buried in their end-user license agreement. When your autonomous digital proxy takes an action with real-world legal or financial consequences, the liability lands on the user. Not the platform. Not the AI model. You authorized it. Jeremy's framing captures exactly why this is coming fast and why it's a problem: "When's the last time you actually read an Apple update before clicking acknowledge?" Nobody reads software agreements today. Nobody is going to start reading AI twin authorization docs. And every fraud scheme operating right now — AI twin mortgage fraud, identity theft, contract manipulation — scales exponentially once autonomous AI agents can execute them simultaneously at scale. Jason's proposed solution surfaces the deeper irony: the most useful AI twin would be one that actually advocates for you. An AI proxy that reads the EULA, flags the predatory clauses, and says "you shouldn't sign this." That AI accountability product won't get built because there's more money pointing in the other direction. 🎙️ Brobots is a weekly tech podcast about AI, health, and becoming a better human in a world being rewritten faster than the laws can keep up. 📍 New episode every Monday → https://brobots.me 🎧 Listen on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and everywhere else #AITwins #DigitalTwin #AIAccountability #BroBots #FutureTech